<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<table border="0" cellpadding="2" align="center" width="968">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<h3 class="color-in-selected-button" align="center">Table of
Contents </h3>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div id="material-container">
<div id="material-after-title">
<div id="contents">
<ul>
<a
href="http://www.brain-mind-magazine.org/read.php?file=Cover-V3-N1.pdf">Front
Cover</a>
<br>
<br>
<a
href="http://www.brain-mind-magazine.org/read.php?file=BMM-V3-N1-a1-HMAX-a.pdf">Deep
Learning is Hot: Max-Pooling Plagiarism?</a><img
src="cid:part3.01040606.02000502@cse.msu.edu"
alt="banner" style="float:left;margin:0 5px 0 0;"
height="100" width="100"> 1 - 2<br>
by <em>Juan L. Castro-Garcia </em><br>
<strong>Abstract: </strong>Deep learning is a term
that describes learning by an artificial neural
network that consists of a cascade of nonlinear
processing layers. Deep learning networks have
recently attracted great interest from industries,
such as Google, Microsoft, IBM, Samsung, and Baidu.
I report a key architecture mechanism of deep
learning network Cresceptron --- well-known now as
max-pooling --- and ask the reader whether HMAX
plagiarized Cresceptron. In this report I do not
claim that this is a plagiarism. <br>
<strong>Index terms: </strong>Machine learning, deep
learning, Cresceptron, HMAX, plagiarism <br>
<br>
<a
href="http://www.brain-mind-magazine.org/read.php?file=BMM-V3-N1-a2-Jiang-a.pdf">How
the U.S. and Chinese Legal Systems Can Be
Corrupted</a><img
src="cid:part5.05000501.02030307@cse.msu.edu"
alt="banner" style="float:left;margin:0 5px 0 0;"
height="100" width="100"> 3 - 4<br>
by <em>Stephen Tao Jiang </em><br>
<strong>Abstract: </strong>One thing is true about
the rules of attorney professional conduct. First,
the rules provide a significant part of the glue
that holds American lawyer or Chinese lawyers
together as a profession. Lawyers in a different
country may have entirely different practice, but
they are all subject to the same rules—ethical and
independent Justice. <br>
<strong>Index terms: </strong>Grievance, judicial
system, checks and balances, corruption <br>
<br>
<a
href="http://www.brain-mind-magazine.org/read.php?file=BMM-V3-N1-a3-Xi-a.pdf">The
Open Letter to Chairman Xi: Your First Challenge
is the Constitution (1)</a><img
src="cid:part7.05070503.08010104@cse.msu.edu"
alt="banner" style="float:left;margin:0 5px 0 0;"
height="100" width="100"> 5 - 6<br>
by <em>Juyang Weng </em><br>
<strong>Abstract: </strong>In the last thirty years
the Chinese economical reform obtained
well-recognized achievements. The root reason is not
so called Chinese model or Chinese characteristics.
Instead, it is a step toward checks and balances of
power. From ruling by a single person to ruling
through discussion in the Politburo Standing
Committee (PSC). From a single person who dictates
his successor to a term limit and that the
(unpublished) single person who dictates his
successor's successor. The lack of science in the
Chinese Constitution and the weakness in its
enforcement are the fundamental reason for China to
still be at a level of developing country and for
the intensification of various social problems.
Employing the secret reason why the brain does not
have a central controller but displays creative
intelligence, I humbly discuss the developmental
science of nations with the respected Chairman Xi
Jingping. To keep each article to be short, this is
the first of the two installments. <br>
<strong>Index terms: </strong>Science of brain and
mind, brain group, constitution, law, Chinese
people's interest <br>
<br>
<a
href="http://www.brain-mind-magazine.org/read.php?file=BMM-V3-N1-a4-Obama-a.pdf">The
5th Open Letter to the U.S. President Obama:
Bombing ISIS is a Strategic Mistake</a><img
src="cid:part9.05070104.09080503@cse.msu.edu"
alt="banner" style="float:left;margin:0 5px 0 0;"
height="100" width="100"> 7 - 8<br>
by <em>Juyang Weng </em><br>
<strong>Abstract: </strong>Although the Obama
administration has made a series of peace efforts in
recent international affairs, it seems to have lost
its principled way in foreign policy. It launched
air strikes on the ISIS organization in Iraq and
Syria. The ISIS organization is not a state, only a
fraction within Iraq and Syria. In principle,
Obama's military action is like a would-be bombing
of the territory of the Communist Party of China
(CPC) during April 1949 to halt the Communist
advance which eventually took over China by late
1949. It is also like, in principle, a would-be
bombing of the territory of North Vietnamese
offensive in 1975. My comparison of these three
events is meant to explain why Obama made a
strategic mistake under the pressure of his peers. <br>
<strong>Index terms: </strong>Brain science, brain
groups, constitution, law, ISIS, Chinese Civil War,
Vietnam War <br>
<br>
<a
href="http://www.brain-mind-magazine.org/read.php?file=CoverBack-2013-03-14.pdf">Back
Cover</a>
9 <br>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">
</pre>
</body>
</html>