<html>
  <head>

    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <br>
    <div class="moz-forward-container">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
        charset=ISO-8859-1">
      Dear colleagues:  <br>
      <br>
      If you are interested, you might want to read the articles early
      as only a limited number of first readers of each article will be
      free of charge from vol. 2.  The Chinese version of this issue is
      still being worked on.   The BMM site: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
        href="http://www.brain-mind-magazine.org/">www.brain-mind-magazine.org/</a><br>
      <br>
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
        charset=ISO-8859-1">
      <table align="center" border="0" cellpadding="2" width="968">
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td><img src="cid:part2.08030801.02080809@cse.msu.edu"
                alt="BMM banner"
                longdesc="http://www.brain-mind-magazine.org/images/BMM-banner.jpg"
                height="233" width="968"></td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>
              <table border="0" cellspacing="5" width="100%">
                <tbody>
                  <tr class="IssueBlockFont">
                    <td class="Blue-Bottom" height="20" width="30%">Winter

                      2013</td>
                    <td width="40%">Vol. 2, No. 1<br>
                    </td>
                    <td width="30%">
                      <div class="Blue-Bottom" align="right">ISSN
                        2166-9732</div>
                    </td>
                  </tr>
                </tbody>
              </table>
              <br>
              <h3 class="color-in-selected-button" align="center">Table
                of Contents </h3>
            </td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>
              <div id="material-container">
                <div id="material-after-title">
                  <div id="contents">
                    <ul>
                      <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.brain-mind-magazine.org/read.php?file=Cover-V2-N1.pdf#view">Front

                        Cover</a>              0 <br>
                      <br>
                      <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.brain-mind-magazine.org/read.php?file=BMM-V2-N1-a1-SelfBiology-a.pdf#view">Understanding

                        the Self Biologically</a><img
                        src="cid:part5.03000803.02060809@cse.msu.edu"
                        alt="banner" style="float:left;margin:0 5px 0
                        0;" height="100" width="100">              1 - 3<br>
                      by <em>Yi Zheng </em>and<em> Gonzalo Munevar </em><br>
                      <strong>Abstract: </strong>In Total Recall the
                      hero discovers that his good-guy self is just
                      implanted memories. His body used to be occupied
                      by another, vicious self, whose allies want back.
                      This fantasy gains some plausibility from the
                      traditional conception of the self as a collection
                      of experiences kept in memory --- a unified
                      conscious self that makes our experiences feel
                      ours. Great fiction, bad neuroscience. There is no
                      central brain structure that corresponds to that
                      self, and some scientists have concluded that the
                      self is an illusion. The notion that the self tags
                      our experiences as ours seems to be wrong. And the
                      idea that the self is a collection of remembered
                      experiences turns out to be false. We propose
                      instead a revolutionary biological conception of
                      the self: The brain has evolved to constitute a
                      self that is mostly unconscious and distributive,
                      which does away with the paradoxes, explains all
                      the seemingly contradictory experimental results,
                      and opens up new avenues of research in
                      neuroscience. <br>
                      <strong>Index terms: </strong>Self, evolution,
                      neuroscience, distributive, brain-imaging <br>
                      <br>
                      <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.brain-mind-magazine.org/read.php?file=BMM-V2-N1-a2-Slogans-a.pdf#view">Turn

                        Slogans into “Science”?</a><img
                        src="cid:part7.03080705.08040400@cse.msu.edu"
                        alt="banner" style="float:left;margin:0 5px 0
                        0;" height="100" width="100">              4 - 7<br>
                      by <em>D. W. Mabaho </em><br>
                      <strong>Abstract: </strong>Juyang Weng’s two
                      letters to Obama amount to a lack and misuse of
                      neuroscience knowledge, impoverishment and
                      confusion in logic, as well as tailoring and
                      misreading of historical facts. It is an example
                      of ideological slogans disguised under the term
                      “science”. <br>
                      <strong>Index terms: </strong>brain-mind, checks
                      of government power, history <br>
                      <br>
                      <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.brain-mind-magazine.org/read.php?file=BMM-V2-N1-a3-CountryBrain-a.pdf#view">Every

                        Country should Self-Organize like a Brain:
                        Rebuttal to D. W. Mabaho</a><img
                        src="cid:part9.08000303.09020404@cse.msu.edu"
                        alt="banner" style="float:left;margin:0 5px 0
                        0;" height="100" width="100">              8 -
                      11<br>
                      by <em>Juyang Weng </em><br>
                      <strong>Abstract: </strong>I would like to thank
                      D. W. Mabaho for raising many questions, which
                      enable me to reply more comprehensively. I am more
                      convinced that every country should self-organize
                      like a brain. This is not an ideology, since the
                      brain's self-organization is highly holistic. <br>
                      <strong>Index terms: </strong>history,
                      checks-and-balances, self-organization <br>
                      <br>
                      <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.brain-mind-magazine.org/read.php?file=BMM-V2-N1-a4-MilgramRichard-a.pdf#view">Private

                        Data: A Huge Problem with Education Research</a><img
                        src="cid:part11.01020205.05020509@cse.msu.edu"
                        alt="banner" style="float:left;margin:0 5px 0
                        0;" height="100" width="100">              12 -
                      13<br>
                      by <em>R. James Milgram </em><br>
                      <strong>Abstract: </strong>A very influential
                      paper on improving math outcomes was published in
                      2008. The authors refused to divulge their data
                      claiming that agreements with the schools and
                      FERPA rules prevented it. It turns out that this
                      is not true. When, by other means, we found the
                      identities of the schools, serious problems with
                      the conclusions of the article were quickly
                      revealed. The 2008 paper was far from unique in
                      this respect. There are many papers that have had
                      huge influences on K-12 mathematics curricula, and
                      could not be independently verified because the
                      authors refused to reveal their data. In this
                      article we describe how we were able to find the
                      real data, and point out the legal constraints
                      that should make it very difficult for authors of
                      such papers to withhold their data in the future.
                      <br>
                      <strong>Index terms: </strong>Evaluation of
                      publication, mathematical education <br>
                      <br>
                      <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.brain-mind-magazine.org/read.php?file=BMM-V2-N1-a5-BoalerJo-a.pdf#view">Standing

                        Up to Academic Bullying: and Those Who Block the
                        Path to Improvements in Education</a><img
                        src="cid:part13.09030208.09030407@cse.msu.edu"
                        alt="banner" style="float:left;margin:0 5px 0
                        0;" height="100" width="100">              14 -
                      15<br>
                      by <em>Jo Boaler </em><br>
                      <strong>Abstract: </strong>Honest academic debate
                      lies at the core of good scholarship. But what
                      happens when, under the guise of academic freedom,
                      people distort the truth in order to promote their
                      position and discredit someone’s evidence? <br>
                      <strong>Index terms: </strong>Evaluation of
                      publication, mathematical education <br>
                      <br>
                      <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.brain-mind-magazine.org/read.php?file=BMM-V2-N1-a6-SolgiMojtaba-a.pdf#view">When

                        a Reviewer's Comments Became Longer than the
                        Submitted Paper</a><img
                        src="cid:part15.07050400.05070501@cse.msu.edu"
                        alt="banner" style="float:left;margin:0 5px 0
                        0;" height="100" width="100">              16 -
                      17<br>
                      by <em>Mojtaba Solgi </em><br>
                      <strong>Abstract: </strong>The debate over the
                      pros and cons of the so-called scholarly peer
                      review of journals is as old as itself. In this
                      short essay, I wish not to take a side, but to
                      simply tell a story. The story is of how a
                      recently published paper [1] was first hammered by
                      the reviewers as vague, incomprehensible and
                      worthy of rejection, and later praised as
                      “unorthodox” and worthy of the attention of the
                      research community. <br>
                      <strong>Index terms: </strong>Peer review,
                      research evaluation, perceptual learning, transfer
                      <br>
                      <br>
                      <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.brain-mind-magazine.org/read.php?file=BMM-V2-N1-a7-Brain3Bitter-a.pdf#view">Brain

                        Stories 3: Bitter Science</a><img
                        src="cid:part17.04000102.08090101@cse.msu.edu"
                        alt="banner" style="float:left;margin:0 5px 0
                        0;" height="100" width="100">              18 -
                      21<br>
                      by <em>Brian N. Huang </em><br>
                      <strong>Abstract: </strong>Like the rest of this
                      series, this is a true story. The developmental
                      program for scientific research --- scientific
                      policies and bylaws --- seems to be immature for
                      upholding justice. The human race is paying dearly
                      for this immaturity using taxpayer dollars.
                      However, I do not mean to discourage bright young
                      people from taking a career in scientific
                      research. <br>
                      <strong>Index terms: </strong>Checks and balances,
                      scientific policies, bylaws, shortsightedness,
                      discrimination, injustice <br>
                      <br>
                      <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.brain-mind-magazine.org/read.php?file=BMM-V2-N1-a8-Letter3Ideology-a.pdf#view">The

                        3rd Open Letter to the US President Obama: Why
                        Government Ideologies Block Knowledge?</a><img
                        src="cid:part19.00010202.03020508@cse.msu.edu"
                        alt="banner" style="float:left;margin:0 5px 0
                        0;" height="100" width="100">              22 -
                      24<br>
                      by <em>Juyang Weng </em><br>
                      <strong>Abstract: </strong>Ideologies are
                      attractive to many constituents who are not aware
                      of the limitations of each ideology. Although the
                      US Constitution was designed for
                      checks-and-balances of power, the most basic
                      problem in the US is still the lack of
                      checks-and-balances of power. Only after US
                      governmental officials and politicians acquire
                      knowledge about how the brain works can they
                      enable the US to overcome the fundamental
                      limitations of its Constitution. Many current
                      major problems in the US cannot be solved without
                      a holistic approach suggested by known theoretical
                      understanding about how our own brains work. <br>
                      <strong>Index terms: </strong>US interest, science
                      of brain and mind, domestic and foreign policies <br>
                      <br>
                      <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.brain-mind-magazine.org/read.php?file=CoverBack-2013-03-14.pdf#view">Back

                        cover</a>              25 <br>
                      <br>
                    </ul>
                    <h3 class="color-in-selected-button" align="center"><a
                        moz-do-not-send="true" name="article"
                        id="article"></a></h3>
                    <p align="center"><em></em><br>
                    </p>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td><img src="cid:part22.00080600.04040502@cse.msu.edu"
                alt="BMI-line-right" height="35" width="968"></td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>
              <table border="0" cellspacing="2" width="968">
                <tbody>
                  <tr>
                    <td class="Blue-Bottom" width="30%">Established
                      since June 2012</td>
                    <td width="40%"><br>
                    </td>
                    <td width="30%">
                      <div class="Blue-Bottom" align="right">Published
                        by <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                          href="http://www.brain-mind-institute.org/">the

                          Brain-Mind Institute</a></div>
                    </td>
                  </tr>
                </tbody>
              </table>
            </td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
      <br>
      <br>
      <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
--
Juyang (John) Weng, Professor
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
MSU Cognitive Science Program and MSU Neuroscience Program
3115 Engineering Building
Michigan State University
East Lansing, MI 48824 USA
Tel: 517-353-4388
Fax: 517-432-1061
Email: <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:weng@cse.msu.edu">weng@cse.msu.edu</a>
URL: <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.cse.msu.edu/%7Eweng/">http://www.cse.msu.edu/~weng/</a>
----------------------------------------------

</pre>
      <br>
    </div>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>