[Bmi] I Allege Nobel Prize in Physics 2024 Went to Misconduct

[Weng, Juyang]

 Dear All:
      It happened again!  Like the Committee of Turing Award 2018, the Nobel Committee for Physics 2024 does not have experts on neural networks either.   Both committees selected AI frauds for their prizes.   I allege that John Hopfield and Geoffrey Hinton committed the following research misconduct in their awarded work: (1) Cheating in the absence of a test; (2) Hiding bad-looking data.  Their techniques are simply media hypes.
    The misconduct should have been willful because both John Hopfield and Geoffrey Hinton should have known that randomly initialized networks led to very different fitting accuracies on a validation set.  Therefore, they should not have reported only the data from the luckiest network without reporting the average data from all the trained networks.  Furthermore, they should not have called their Post-Selected fitting precisions as "test" because there is an absence of a test. The programmers know the validation set that was used for the Post-Selection of the luckiest network, like a mock exam.
    Such Post-Selection misconduct has flooded AI since their works and their models are not generalizable, so is true with a lucky lottery ticket. The Committee of Nobel Prize in Physics has promoted the misconduct, hurt AI, and misled AI applications.   AI is undergoing another Great Leap Forward based on data falsification worldwide.   Yes, fake money is driving real money away.
    For more information, see  IEEE CDR Newsletters https://www.cse.msu.edu/amdtc/amdnl/CDSNL-V18-N3.pdf.
    Best regards,
-John Weng
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cse.msu.edu/pipermail/bmi/attachments/20241009/9cb21979/attachment.html>